Church and State

Recently, Bishop Brian Tamaki of the Destiny Church has caused a lot of controversy, by saying that New Zealand is a “Christian Country”. More specifically he sugested that people from other countries shouldn’t be allowed to pray in schools, or do things in New Zealand they would do in their home countries. He also sugested that the parliamentary prayer should continue to refer to “the Christian God, Jesus Christ” and people ahould continue to be sworn in to public offices using the bible.

The way I tend to aproach such issues is based on the Christian principle “Do unto others as you would have them do to you” (Luke 6:31). Under this principle, banning private non-Christian prayer in state schools would be funadamentally unacceptable. people should (within reason) be allowed to pratice whatever religon they choose. As for the aprliamentry prayer, there should at minimum be an opt out provision for non-christian MPs, and possibly replaced with a minute of silence when MPs can pray to whatever God they believe in.  However, one should not go overboard with secularism. The statement of religous diversity goes too far in saying “New Zealand has no offical or established religion”. While I agree with the “no offical religon” part of it, Christianity has been in New Zealand for two hundred years and most new Zealanders still identify themselves as Christian., and it appears to say that religon doesn’t exist in nNw Zealand.  In some countries such as France and Turkey we have laws banning people from wearing headscarves, and thus banning people from practicing their religon. Practices that try and ban people from practicing religon should be considered violations of human rights, and secular fundamentalism.  In general the aproach to church and state should be to give all religons equality under law, even if allowing for minor exceptions (e.g. public holidays on Easter and Christmass, national anthem), allowing people the right to practice their religon, and tolerating religon and other religons. All attempts to forcibly stop people practicing their religon, without very good reason, should be opposed.

Advertisements
Explore posts in the same categories: Brian Tamaki, Church and State, Destiny Church

2 Comments on “Church and State”

  1. Andrew McPherson Says:

    People should not be free to join anything disguised as a religion. What about the Raelians, the Scientologists, the Density Church?

    All of these are not even trying to disguise their avaricious desire for follower’s money.
    None of which have any touch with reality, and all have a vested interest in denying the plain truth that they follow false profits.

    I say, if you wish to credit a man with intelligence, assume him to be an atheist and don’t try to convert him on the weekend sleep-in time, especially if he only is wearing a pair of boxers.
    Also, why should anyone discriminate against civil servants or politicians if they aren’t christian? It goes against the human rights given to all that everyone has freedom of religion, as well as freedom from religion.

  2. sha Says:

    he is a con man


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: